A forbearance measure is profitable when it is more advantageous than the alternative of terminating the deal and liquidating the collateral. The comparison of these alternatives is based on the corresponding net present value. The measure with the highest net present value is assumed to be the most suitable and sustainable measure.
Such a benefit assessment may be mandatory for the bank and/or the supervisory authorities. According to the EBA guidelines on management of non-performing and forborne exposures (EBA/GL/2018/06), a comparison of the planned forbearance measure with alternative measures should be performed. In particular, it must be examined whether a termination of the deal and a liquidation of the collateral leads to a higher fair value than the continuation of the deal when granting the forbearance measure.
The following present values are calculated as part of the profitability test using the effective interest rate (EIR) for discounting:
In conclusion, a forbearance measure is profitable if the present value of the exposure – assuming the forbearance measure will be carried out – is greater than or equal to the present value for the alternative of terminating the deal and liquidating the collateral. The result of the profitability test as well as the parameters used in the calculation are traceable in detail and also available for auditing purposes after approval.